Europe Warns its Citizens: Preparing for War is no Longer Unthinkable

In recent months, a marked shift has been taking place across Europe—one that has seen leaders, defense officials, and policymakers increasingly urge their citizens to take seriously the possibility of war. This is not sensationalism or media hype. It is a coordinated response to what many European leaders now view as a genuine and growing threat, primarily from Russia. With the war in Ukraine showing no signs of abating and Russia adopting increasingly aggressive rhetoric and tactics, several European nations are no longer ruling out the possibility of a broader conflict. Instead, they are telling their citizens to be mentally and materially prepared.

This shift in tone and policy is not happening in a vacuum. Germany, long reluctant to adopt a militarized stance due to its historical legacy, has made a dramatic turn. Its Defense Minister recently declared that the Bundeswehr must become “ready for war,” positioning Germany as a military leader in Europe. The country is revising its national defense strategy and is looking to lead not only in economic strength but also in military readiness. Germany’s newfound assertiveness is echoed in the voices of several other NATO countries, particularly those bordering Russia or within its historical sphere of influence.

One of the most vocal nations in this regard is Lithuania. The Baltic state has long warned of the dangers posed by Russia and has now taken concrete steps that surpass NATO’s baseline recommendations. Lithuania plans to increase its defense budget to 5.5% of GDP by 2026, a significant leap from the alliance’s current 2% target. In a recent statement, Lithuania’s defense minister argued that this level of spending should become the new minimum for all NATO allies.

The call to arms is not just about boosting military budgets. There is also an effort to mentally prepare the population. In Sweden, which recently joined NATO, the government sent out public guidance on how to act in the event of war or hybrid threats, urging households to stock basic necessities and pay attention to civil defense protocols. Sweden has revived its Cold War-era “Total Defense” concept, where every citizen is considered part of the national defense effort. Similar programs are being explored in Finland, Poland, and the Czech Republic.

Part of this growing anxiety comes from real intelligence. Western security services, including those of the UK, Germany, and the Baltics, have uncovered what they describe as “hybrid” operations orchestrated by Russian and Belarusian operatives. These activities include sabotage of infrastructure, cyberattacks, disinformation campaigns, and targeted. European intelligence agencies are now openly warning that these actions are not isolated but part of a broader strategy aimed at weakening NATO’s cohesion and discouraging support for Ukraine.

The EU has even proposed a massive €800 billion initiative under the name “Readiness 2030” to fortify its defense infrastructure. This proposal would mark the most ambitious joint defense investment in the bloc’s history and seeks to prepare Europe for scenarios that would have been considered unlikely just a few years ago. Missile defense has become a major priority as well. The German-led “European Sky Shield Initiative” now includes over 20 countries and is seen as Europe’s answer to Israel’s Iron Dome. The idea is to create a coordinated, continent-wide system capable of detecting and intercepting missile threats. Such a system not only protects military targets but also reassures citizens that Europe is not defenseless against aerial attacks. In the past, such discussions might have been dismissed as alarmist. Today, they are part of serious policy debates and budget allocations.

Importantly, these measures are not being introduced in secret or behind closed doors. Governments are actively involving the public in discussions about defense and preparedness. This transparency reflects a fundamental change in how European nations are thinking about war—not as a distant possibility but as a scenario that requires planning and participation from everyone, from government officials to ordinary families. Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022 was the turning point, but the ripple effects have continued to intensify since then. Every Russian missile strike on Ukrainian infrastructure, every cyberattack on Western power grids, every attempt to destabilize democratic institutions through disinformation adds fuel to Europe’s growing sense of urgency.

Some critics argue that this focus on defense and militarization risks provoking the very conflict it seeks to prevent. But proponents counter that the real provocation would be doing nothing leaving Europe vulnerable and divided in the face of clear threats. History, they say, has already shown the cost of appeasement and complacency. For many Europeans, these developments are unsettling. War, long thought to be something that happened elsewhere, is now a part of the national conversation. While no one is claiming that war is inevitable, the message from European governments is increasingly consistent: hope for peace, but prepare for conflict. It is a message not spoken in panic, but in realism. And for the first time in decades, it appears that Europe is listening.

***

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any agency. This article is intended for informational purposes only and should not be quoted, cited, or reproduced without prior written permission.​